I went to this movie yesterday with family members, two of which were children, and as I sat there watching it, the following ran through my mind: creepy, weird, disturbing. In the movie, Spike Jonze goes right up to “the line” of “unsettling,” dips a toe over it, then backs off. But keeps tapping that damn toe right on that line.
How is this made for kids?
How was it childlike, carefree, and happy-go-lucky—like the book?
Before seeing the movie I admit I read a review, but after having gone, I had to reread it. Check out some others. I really loved the book. Loved the weirdness of it—I like weird—the message and artwork, and all, but seeing it as a movie…my first thoughts were that some things are perhaps better left as books. As the reviews stated, the movie was not made for kids. However, the book was created for 4 to 8 year olds.
Now, sure, kids might “like” the movie—but what, exactly might they “like” about it?
Visuals, of course.
And define the age group “kids.”
Yes, the movie is visually stunning. Incredible imagery! But, more so, its atmosphere is dark and creepy. Foreboding. Constantly alluding to “something” not shown on-screen that is just barely contained (well, there is one scene of bones hidden in the embers of one smoldering fire). And the low-talking Wild Things are about as unnerving and disturbing in and of themselves as any other on-screen monsters (I admit I really liked their portrayal in that way). The restrained and heavily implied element of nasty power. The dialog definitely is that of a child’s mindset—and I understand all of that. And since it was made into a movie, you do have to fill in more than all of the five minutes it takes you to actually read the book. And, in that vein, I think Jonze did a great job of capturing Child Think. Even seeing the opening 15 or 20 minutes of “reality” of the movie brought me screaming back to my own youth, in terms of the low-lit wintry atmosphere and snow tunnels. The cozy dark feel of an older house in winter. That really touched a nerve for me. Got me into the mindset. Then later, at Wild Thing Island, I understood the “cut out their brains” lingo and dirt clod fights, the fort building, etc. It’s about adults trying to capture the mind and thoughts of being a kid. I get that. And after doing some more Internet searches, I found that the movie wasn’t even supposed to be marketed to children, at least 4 to 8 year olds.
But after finding the Wild Things YouTube, and watching that (yeah, I know—we don’t own a copy, but other family members do…), it reminded me that the book was more lighthearted. Fun. Childlike.
I really can’t fault a person for wanting to make a movie out of an iconic children’s book. Heck, even Maurice Sendak apparently wanted the book made into one. But, I think what perhaps really caught me off-guard was that Where The Wild Things Are was a children’s book, so I expected a children’s movie. That is not what was delivered. And I don’t think the production company’s “mentioning” that in any way could have saved the film. Thinking back on the movie trailers I saw, this was not what came across in any way, and just voicing that concern didn’t do the trick. That book is so ingrained into everyone’s mindset that no matter how it was marketed, people everywhere were going to see it, come hell or high water—and bring kids. There was no way around that. And as my wife and I discussed, and I agree with her, I think the movie could have taken a much lighter tone—more like the book.
Again, with the book.
So, the movie was an adult’s re-imagining of a treasured children’s story, but it’s not a movie for children. It’s made for adults—and that’s okay. Even adults need a “children’s story” or two. Help remind them where they came from. So, had I gone into the movie with that in mind, perhaps it wouldn’t have unsettled me so much that children were being brought to this movie.
The movie is dark.
It is creepy.
And disturbing.
And I liked it.